jack of all trades

incrementalism is when one puts a little here and a little there. at the end of the day, you get a little of this and a little of that. butter becomes too thinly spread you can barely taste it

the thing is, a good enough amount of this and none of that is almost always better than a little of this and a little of that.

sen. roxas pointed out that that's one mistake the government has been doing over and over. a little for defense, a little for health, a little for education and a little for that bridge by the river.
i pointed out that that is one huge problem of mine too. i do a little of studying, a little of working out, a little of performing and so on.

it's sad.
cause at the end of the day i can never be as confident as everyone else on a particular field.
so i ask: do i really have to choose? when is too many too many? when am i spreading myself too thinly?

and i answer: i don't know.
maybe i will forever be just a member of the many orgs i participate in [for me, for the org or both]. maybe i will end up like sen. flavier a.k.a mr. quorom who is always present in committee meetings to make sure it meets a quorom. maybe i will die with the words "the guy who tried everything but never really succeeded on anything" on my tombstone.

or maybe i'm just thinking too much, which is another problem of mine my friends would love to point out. maybe

but for now, i'll keep this in mind: the pareto principle.
the pareto principle states that 80% of our productivity stems from 20% of our priorities.

and what's cool is everything seems to fit into place. no conflict in schedules so far
looking forward to what's to come

lisnin to desperate housewives. not so interesting to me
sortof readin wikipedia
feelin kinda uhm-ok-y